The date of the Iraqi elections is a watershed day for their country. January 30, 2005 is now commonly recognized as the date when the Iraqis became a democratic country. The effort now is to ensure stability and growth in the fledgling democracy. Here is my take on the significance of the elections and what they will mean in the coming months and years:
The Sunni minority decided to boycott the elections. There were published threats that any who voted stand the probability they would be killed for siding with (fill in the blank with “U.S.” or “unlawful government” or “illegal election procedures” or whatever you want. The Sunnis opted not to participate in the electoral process. Remember that there had not been a democratically elected government in Iraq since forever. Since Saddam had been in power for over 20 years, the established government worked just fine for those who were in power.
Now Democracy is having a go. However, when the Sunnis decided to not vote, they thought they were making a stand for the right and for solidarity and nationalism. They were not represented in the results of the election and others (Kurds, Shi’a and others) were voted into power. When the Sunnis saw the dancing in the streets and the national celebration of people assuming, as our own Declaration of Independence says, “the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them,” the Sunnis did a collective “oops, we have made a
mistake.”
When I talked to a local Muslim cleric, he said that, as a Sunni, he regrets not “getting the finger.” I needed a few minutes to search my memory files to understand what he meant. Once a person voted, the polling officials required the person to dip their index finger in ink to mark them for the remainder of the day. That eliminated the possibility of voting a second time. This simple act became a symbol of national pride, persona strength and historical significance. This symbol was replicated by our own members of Congress who waved their own inked fingers during President Bush’s State of the Union speech a few days later. This finger waving was a sign of our U. S. solidarity with the Iraqi democratic process.

Backlash: How do you include people in the forming of a government “duly elected by the people” who refused to vote or elect anyone who had their interests in mind? This is the place where true diplomacy occurs. The struggle with democracy is that even when in power, the minority must be protected and represented. There were heated and interesting debates and back office arguments about how democracy works. Some rightly said, “If they don’t vote, they have no voice. That is their fault and their problem.” Others also rightly said, “We should include them in the government because all should have a voice and we need them to solidify our goals.”
When the Imam told me that he regretted that he did not get the finger, he went on to explain the situation. He did not vote under threat of violence or even death. He now struggles about not being brave enough to vote. Those who voted and got the finger made a stand that I think will have repercussions for generations.
More on this later.