The Iraqi people continue to amaze me with their insight, diligence and determination. Last week I spoke with a woman who left her home in a distant province to move to Baghdad.
“Why did you move?” “Only in Baghdad can you make a difference” she replied. The belief is that the seat of power for the country is in Baghdad and to make any significant changes in the society or culture or government, one must be at the seat of power.
“Our country has known nothing except corruption for the last 35 years. Our leaders know nothing else. Everything in our society is based upon power and corruption.”
As we continued to talk, she explained more and we had a very interesting dialogue about our differing cultures.
She explained what she meant about power and corruption. When Saddam Hussein assumed power, he began a regime of corruption. Kickbacks and payola became a way of life. The concept of public service and service for the greater good fell out of the public consciousness. “What can I get for me?” became the byword of the administration. Positions of power were merely positions. There was not a mandate for performance, only a desire for position. From what many have told me about some of the leadership positions, the job only involved “holding the job.” Visiting others in positions of power and drinking coffee and smoking around the hookah pipe was all that was expected of powerful people. Actually providing any public service was not a pressing consideration. If any public service was conducted, that happened at lower levels and only after extreme pressure was applied from higher ups.
After 35 years of corruption, there is not a template for public service.
The maxim continued to prove true: “Power corrupts. Total power corrupts totally.” Those in power became more and more corrupt as their power increased. The whole purpose in being in power was to stay in power and enjoy the powerful position.
Now lay a 35 year template on the country. Anyone younger than 50 years of age has no real recollection of any type of governing leadership that was not corrupt (assuming that 15 year olds paid attention to government anyway). Citizens who are over 50 either had to accept the way that government ran or not be a part of it. (Those who resisted the status quo are not around anymore).
One of her interesting remarks was that they have no heroes to admire or to emulate. There is no Nathan Hale who regretted that he had but one life to give for his country. There is no one to admire who said, “Give me liberty or give me death.” All the leaders that these people know were the ones who kidnapped their 14 year old daughters and murdered them, or who were involved in kickbacks and corruption.
It is no surprise to us to see that there are missing millions of dollars of our U.S. contract money and shoddy work being done on public works projects. If we don’t participate in payola, then why should the work be good?
I asked her a question that she could have found offensive. “Why are you not corrupt?”
“I decided that the children need better. I have decided that I would move to Baghdad for the sake of the children.”
“Are you married with children?”
“No, I am single. I care about the children of the next generation of our country. They need to know what true freedom is about and how to live without fear and corruption.”
I look forward to meeting more like her in the future.