When will we have victory?
In past wars, the time of victory was never uncertain. There was a surrender, a treaty, a capitulation of the vanquished. The moment in time could be noted on a calendar, photographed, annualized, and remembered. We could celebrate what became Veterans Day (the 11th day of the 11th month) for WWI, or V - E Day, V - J Day for WWII. Schwarzkopf sitting in a tent with Hussein’s Generals let us know that the ’91 liberation of Kuwait was complete.
But how will we know when this war in Iraq is complete?
Is it right to even call it a war? President Bush’s administration has declared a global war on terrorism, but the actual criteria for a war do not truly exist. This is a battle of ideological differences that is not defined by countries’ borders, uniforms or flags. That distinction is critical. There never will be a cessation of hostilities due to an agreement or peace signing ceremony. Ideology is not changed due to dominance of force.
Now what about IRAQ?
We could leave tomorrow and we would have accomplished our mission which was to overthrow Saddam. The pundits can postulate about WMD’s forever, but ultimately, the overthrow of Saddam was the true (hidden) objective and that was achieved. His regime had destabilized the entire region and that was unacceptable for our national objectives. Now that he is gone, the trouble we have is keeping the Former Regime Elements (FRE) and Foreign Fighters (FF) from reasserting itself. To remove our forces from the region would further destabilize the area. To stay longer will cost more lives and more money but the inevitable result will be stabilization of the region.
The administration has made many mistakes. Military and political thinkers agree on this point. The disagreement is no longer about why we got here, or what will we do next, but how do we get out? Should “peace with honor” be a part as it was in Vietnam? I don’t think that is the right question.
Last Sunday, one This Week on ABC, George Stephanopoulow interviewed Senator Joseph Biden, the ranking Democtrat on the Senate Foregin Relations Committee. Senator Biden insisted that the goal should be to get our troops out of Iraq as quickly as possible. I agree. He then goes on to insist that the President should hold to the “Pottery Barn rule” which is “you break it, you buy it” and the President has broken the pottery. He owns it.
But I wonder how you “break it” to begin with. Mistakes, yes. More difficult than expected, yes. But broken? What was it before there was justice, before there were elections, before the overthrow if not broken?
Biden continues that his solution is to first fire Rumsfeld. (I see that as vendictive, not helpful in any form). “Secondly, lay out specific terms, Mr. President, as to how many Iraqis you have to train, when you are training them, when you expect them to be trained, and when you expect to be able to draw down American forces so that we can judge whether or not you have a plan, Mr. President.”
Mr. Senator, you have no idea what you are talking about any more than you could have predicted that we could take boys from the farms and factories of the U.S. heartland in 1942 and form an army to fight WWII (which took two plus years). And in WWII we were talking about men who had been through the Great Depression, not who had been born and lived their entire lives in a regime of oppression and devastation.
The Iraqi soldiers of today and their police counterparts are incredibly brave people. Yet they also know that the only way to provide for their country and ultimately themselves is to join and fight. To stand in line to join puts their very lives at risk. But in an economy that has been in shambles for generations, they risk that to feed their children. [Saddam’s economy was simply to pay those who supported you and ignore the rest. Everyone who wanted to eat supported Saddam].
[Last week I spoke with a woman who said her friends join the military and the police because you can live with hungry children only so long. You have these options:
Live with hungry children that tears your heart out-
Join the military-
Join the police-
Join the terrorists- Those are your choices. She said, “I would sell myself rather than live with hungry children that cry all day long.” She is employed as a government worker and is grateful to have the job.]
So how can the President say how long it will take to raise an army and a police force? Should it be free from corruption? Should it be ready to defend its borders? Should it enforce the laws? Laws require a judicial system that is counter-supportive. That system has not been in place for 50 years. Should the police learn to live on their salary and not be subject to graft and kickbacks? That requires training a new way of thinking not just for the police, but for the citizens as well, who don’t trust the police.
Sending people to boot camp or a training center does not make them a competent police or military with a time line on completion, Mr. Senator.
It is easy to throw stones at mistakes. It is much more difficult to put a time line on learning how to live in a newly formed Democracy. Getting out is simple. Doing it right is painful. I think we would do well to do it right.















